What's it like to take the 11-plus? 'To be written off as a failure is a travesty' - Educational Notes

Click & Cash

Breaking

Home Top Ad

Post Top Ad

Friday, October 16, 2015

What's it like to take the 11-plus? 'To be written off as a failure is a travesty'

As England prepares for its first new grammar school in 50 years, seven readers share how the entrance exam affected them                                                      
Children being coached for the 11-plus exam.             
Children being coached for the 11-plus exam. Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian

Receiving the result was pretty traumatic for me

At the age of 10, for family reasons, I moved from rural Cornwall to Leeds, Yorkshire, and though my English ability was high I found I was way behind in mathematics which ultimately (I presume) led to my 11-plus failure.
Receiving the result was pretty traumatic for me and my working-class parents who, although on a low income, had supported me by buying books. A further blow was losing many friends because they went on to grammar school.
I ended up at a secondary modern school where pupils left at 15 without taking GCEs. I was top of my class in every subject except maths, getting 100% in English, history and geography, and the head tried to get me transferred to the local grammar school. However, because my maths were seen as so poor they refused to accept me. I spent the rest of my time at school saved from boredom by winning essay prizes, becoming director of the school’s internal radio programme, writing and acting in plays, and contributing stories to the school magazine. Afterwards I got a clerical job at the Home Office and continued my education at night school. Not easy.
Later, by the way, I went to university, got a good degree, and enjoyed a 40-year career, first in advertising, then as an English and drama teacher.
Needless to say, I am vehemently opposed to selective education!
William Earl, retired teacher, Spain

The reality then dawned that half of my friends were going to the local comprehensive

No tutoring. Exam was not that hard, as I remember. Afterwards, talking over the answers with friends realised I had got most of the same answers so was quietly relieved. When I got the results I was very happy as I was under the impression that the school that I was going to was the best. Parents very happy! The reality then dawned that half of my friends were going to the local comprehensive and that I wouldn’t be hanging around with them from then on! It was a long summer ...
Overall my experiences at school were good – mainly for making friends that I still see 25 years on! School was heavily academic (I was not) and sport-oriented (I was not) – so I was average in most subjects. I did OK, passed all GCSEs, but left in the fifth year to study A-levels at FE level at local college.
I was into art and design – this was not accounted for at the grammar school, all they were interested in was future Oxbridge and university candidates! Most of the people I know who went to the school have done well – some exceptionally, and a few others not so brilliantly ... but on the whole all employed, house-owners, families, etc.
Mat Thurston, studio manager, Essex

I sat my 11+ over 10 years ago - I'm now 23. I failed it, miserably. I went in there with no tuition - my mum didn't believe in it, though she knew that all the other 11 year old's going to sit this test had forked out for it. I was bright, but unprepared. I don't think it's fair that an 10 year old should be familiar with the concept of revision (my birthday is in July so I was slightly younger). I still remember the feeling of opening that letter to see that I had been unsuccessful - and off I went to a normal comprehensive secondary school. I hadn't known failure before then, I was a bright student. I went on to get 3 As and 1 A* at A Level, and go on to study law at University. The point I'm trying to make is that an 11+ is an exam which requires tutoring, revision and a lot of work by the 10/11 year old students. Natural brightness and intelligence might not always cut it. If I had a child, I wouldn't put them through that.

To be written off as a ‘failure’ at 10 or 11 is a travesty and there must be a better way

Advertisement
I was in the middle of a difficult time and was not working hard, plus I had a teacher who was retiring and had lost interest in teaching. I missed the second exam due to illness and had to do it later on my own. I was “borderline” and remember having to submit additional work and information but I did not pass and went to the local secondary modern school. I wasn’t tutored as my parents did not believe that was the right thing to do. As both my siblings had failed I was not too bothered when I heard I had as well. However there was an overriding sense of “failure” which stayed with me for a long time.
Going to a secondary modern school full of people who were “failures” was not a positive experience. Defining a thousand plus kids in this way and putting them in a school together is a recipe for failure. To be written off as a “failure” at 10 or 11 is a travesty and there must be a better way. There were some very bright people at the school but inevitably they did not do as well as they should have done.
Speaking for myself and my family, four of us “failed” the 11-plus. Over the years two of us have gained postgraduate qualifications, three of us have degrees, all of us have had good jobs. I would argue that the system is not an accurate way to assess intelligence, although of course it could be argued that it did not prevent us from progressing educationally. However, it has been a battle and the effects at times are deep-rooted and continue to impact on me 30-odd years later.
Anonymous, professional, Yorkshire

I know quite a few women who were shunted off to the secondary modern schools despite very high intelligence

Advertisement
I took it all in my stride. Assumed I would pass and did. I was one of the brightest in the year at a Catholic prep school (mainly girls) in Scarborough and took the exam a year early. Our teacher did lots of exam practice with us so we were very well prepared.
Most of the people who didn’t pass went on to the convent grammar school anyway as it was direct grant. Just one went to the girls’ high school so far as I can remember.
I found out years later that some who hadn’t passed were sacrificial lambs to let more boys “pass” the 11-plus. I know quite a few women who were shunted off to the secondary modern schools despite very high intelligence .
Absolutely loved school but when I went into teaching in the 70s I realised I was greatly in favour of the equal opportunities that a comprehensive school offers. I had a very privileged education despite my lowly family background and am sincerely grateful for the friendship and teaching I experienced. Many were not so lucky.
The secondary modern curriculum was good for some but terrible for those who had just missed out on passing the 11-plus and who would have thrived in a more academic milieu.
Anonymous, retired teacher, Selby

I went to a local primary school and was bored out of my mind. A class patiently reading their way through material page by page for weeks that I had read in its entirety on the first day. Endless repetition of the most basic arithmetic. Infantile spelling drills. There were a couple of decent and intelligent teachers who just allowed me to read at my own pace, otherwise I'd have gone mad.
I had no real idea what the 11+ was when I took it, but after that I found myself in a school where I had to work, as did the other kids, and whatever it was, it wasn't boring. It was actually difficult, some of it, which was a completely novel and disconcerting experience.
I am in retrospect very grateful that I managed to get into an environment where I was treated as an intellectual adult and in company with other kids who were being similarly treated and having demands made on them.
Finally we were around 16 I suppose, and one of the teachers in assigning work handed out some extracts from a textbook with the remark that this was US first year college material, so it should be just about right for us. And it was. And by then we were expected to make our own way through it and ask questions where we didn't understand something, and we did.
What we would have done in a modern comprehensive I cannot imagine. Another six or seven years of boredom, irritation and frustration while the class patiently worked its way through the obvious, or never even got beyond the basics. I feel very sorry for those who through no fault of their own other than being bright have modern British education inflicted on them in the name of political correctness and one size fits all teaching. It probably scars them for life.

A B grade was disappointing and C grades were looked down upon

I went to a small primary school and the 11-plus was not given a huge amount of attention. We had a couple of classes explaining what would be in the test but otherwise it was down to the parents or private tutors to teach the exam techniques. My dad gave me a bit of tutoring and I remember the actual exam being fairly harmless, but I was shocked to find out that only six of us in the school had passed. When you’re 11 you don’t understand what it means for your education and at the time I just remember being upset that a lot of my friends weren’t going to go to the same school as me.
Advertisement
I went to a grammar school in Buckinghamshire and I feel like I was extremely lucky in the education that I received. As soon as I got there it was obvious that a lot of students had been privately tutored, with some students even coming from “preparatory” schools which geared them towards the 11-plus throughout private school.
I only really started appreciating the quality of the education when I entered sixth form and started applying for higher education as it made me realise that the school had geared me towards better universities than I had expected.
On the downside, my school put an extreme amount of pressure on its students with regards to grades and university applications. A B grade was disappointing and C grades were looked down upon. It felt like an exam factory towards the end of my time there, with the school desperate for every student to get the best grades possible so that it could get placed higher in the league tables.
I was nearly breaking down at one point and that kind of pressure on 17- and 18-year-olds doesn’t always work. Even so, I know that the teachers helped me in every way possible to get the grades I needed, so for that I’m glad I ended up in the school that I did.
Katie, university student, Glasgow

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Bottom Ad

Pages